Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Debunking This Gender Identity Hoop-Law And Nonsense ,Here More Proof Surprising Ways Men and Women Sense Things Differently?

Though it sounds like something you’d give some serious feminist side-eye, studies suggest that women really do seem to be the more “sensitive” gender. That is, they tend to taste, smell, hear, see colors, and feel textures more accurately than men—even though, in most cases, researchers aren’t sure exactly why, says Marcia Pelchat, PhD, a sensory scientist who studies taste and smell at the Monell Chemical Sciences Center in Philadelphia.
Some theories: Gender differences in the senses may have a biological basis, Pelchat says, but there may also be a societal and psychological component, as well. “Women are more likely to do the laundry, the cooking, the cleaning—they worry about whether a rag smells like mildew or if food’s gone bad,” she explains. “So they may actually have more experience with odors and flavors, and that may increase their sensitivity or their ability to process these things.”
Check out what the research says about the fascinating ways men and women differ in how we perceive the five senses.


Women may be better suited for tasks that involve choosing paint swatches or color palettes. According to a 2012 City University of New York study, they are better able to distinguish between subtle shades of primary colors (red, green, yellow, and blue) than men. In addition, men are far more likely to have some form of color blindness—a pigment problem that makes it difficult to distinguish between colors. The disorder usually has agenetic component and is rarely found in women.
Men do seem to have one advantage when it comes to vision: Another study by the same researchers found that guys are better able to pick up on sudden movements and identify rapidly changing images—a trait that perhaps evolved from their traditional role as hunters.


People with smaller fingers have a finer sense of touch (or tactile acuity), according to a 2009 study published in the Journal of Neuroscience, giving women—who tend to be smaller overall—yet another advantage over men. Smaller digits have more closely spaced sensory receptors, so are therefore able to pick up on more varieties of outside stimulation, the authors concluded.
But it’s important to note that fingertip size, not gender, was the sole factor contributing to these findings, according to Massachusetts General Hospital physician Ethan Lerner, MD, “So, a man with fingertips that are smaller than a woman’s will be more sensitive to touch than the woman,” he cautioned in a press release about the study.


Men are five and a half times more likely to lose their hearing than women, according to a 2008 study from Johns Hopkins University. But, because boys and girls show no differences in ability when they’re born, experts speculate that most of these changes are due to lifestyle and environmental factors—like smoking, noise exposure, and cardiovascular risk factors—that affect more men than women.
Other research, however, has found that women of all ages have better hearing at frequencies above 2,000 Hz, but that, as they age, they are less able to hear low frequencies (1,000 to 2,000 Hz) than men.


Scientists have long known that women tend to outperform men on tests for identifying scents, but only recently have they found a potential biological explanation. A study published in the November 2014 issue ofPLoS ONE found that post-mortem female brains had, on average, 43% more cells and almost 50% more neurons in their olfactory centers (the part dedicated to smelling and odors) than male brains.
The study’s authors can’t be sure that these extra cells are responsible for greater smelling ability, but they say it’s a good guess. From an evolutionary perspective an enhanced sense of smell may have helped women choose mates for reproductive purposes.


Considering how closely smell and taste are related, it’s not surprising that women also tend to have more sensitive palates than men. In fact, research from Yale University has found that women actually have moretaste buds on their tongues. About 35% of women (and only 15% of men) can call themselves “supertasters,” which means they identify flavors such as bitter, sweet, and sour more strongly than others.
Also of note: Women of childbearing age taste flavors more intensely than younger or older females, and they may also notice increased sensitivity during pregnancy, Pelchat adds.

Debunking This Gender Identity Hoop-Law And Nonsense ,Here More Proof, Study: Men Mature at 43, Women a Decade Sooner


It won't come as a surprise to most females that men mature later than women, but new research has pinpointed the exact age that boys mature completely as 43 - 11 whole years after women.

The study into the differences in maturity between genders revealed both men and women agree that males remain 'immature' well into their late 30s and early 40s. By contrast, the average age at which women mature is just 32.

Alarmingly, eight out of ten women believe that men ‘never stop being childish’ - with breaking wind, burping, eating fast food in the early hours and playing videogames their biggest bug-bears.

Staying silent during arguments, not being able to cook simple meals and re-telling the same old jokes and stories when with the lads were also hailed as signs of immaturity.

Men were nearly twice as likely to describe themselves as immature than were women with one in four men believing they are actively immature.

Women were also twice as likely as men to feel that they were the 'grown up' one in their current relationship.

A quarter of women felt they were the ones made all the important decisions in the relationship with the same percentage wishing their partner would talk about themselves and what they’re feeling more often.

Women also found British men’s biggest maturity failings were still finding breaking wind funny, driving too fast and playing video games.

As a result, three in ten women have ended a relationship because they lost patience with the guy being too immature.

A whopping 46 per cent of women have had a relationship in which they felt they had to mother their partner a bit too much.

In fact the average British woman has to tell her partner to 'act his age' more than once a month - an average of 14 times a year.

Immaturity does have an upside though, with four in ten people saying that it is important in a relationship because it ensures the partnership stays fun and keeps things fresh.
One in three people think a bit of immaturity helps in bonding well with children.

More Liberal Bull Shit,Debunking This Gender Identity Hoop-Law And Nonsense ,Here More Proof Men Are People, Women Are Body Parts

Our brains process images of men and women differently.
When you look at a photo mosaic, you will either see it in its entirety or as a collection of parts. This is controlled by two separate mental functions
 — local processing is usually used for objects such as houses and cars, while global processing helps us see things as a whole. But scientists from theUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, US, have found that this doesn’t seem to apply to how we view women.
“We don’t break people down to their parts — except when it comes to women, which is really striking,” says assistant professor Sarah Gervais, lead author of the study published in the European Journal of Social Psychology. “Women were perceived in the same ways that objects are viewed.”
To test this theory of objectification, Gervais and her colleagues presented their study participants with a series of images featuring fully clothed, average-looking men and women. After a brief pause, the participants were then shown two new images
 — one was the original image, the other had been slightly modified — and asked to identify which image they had seen previously.

When they were presented with images of men, the participants relied on global cognitive processing to see the person as a whole and were able to recognise sexual body parts better in the context of the entire person. However, women were analysed with local cognitive processing, which breaks the object down into its component parts and made sexual body parts more recognisable when they were presented in isolation.
And before anyone says “typical males”, the results show that women also perceive other women this way. “It could be related to different motives,” Gervais suggests. “Men might be doing it because they’re interested in potential mates, 

while women may do it as more of a comparison with themselves. But what we do know is that they’re both doing it.”
But there’s good news for women who are sick of trying to get people to keep their eyes on their face, as the researchers found a way to alleviate this sexual body part recognition bias. When the experiment was adjusted to create a condition where it was easier for the participants to use global processing, making a woman’s whole body more easily recognisable than her various sexual body parts.

More Liberal Bull Shit,Debunking This Gender Identity Hoop-Law And Nonsense ,Here More Proof Men & Women Are Different Species, Psychologically Speaking

What's the Latest Development?
Men and women have fundamentally different personalities, says new research from the University of Manchester, in the UK. Based on a personality test of 10,000 Americans aged 15 to 92, the lead researcher Paul Irwing said: "Psychologically, men and women are almost a different species." The test asked individuals to rate their own character according to 15 different personality facets including warmth, emotional stability, dominance, liveliness, social boldness, sensitivity and openness to change. 
What's the Big Idea?
The new findings run counter to past research which concluded that men and women are more emotionally similar than different. Now, one of the researchers who contributed to those studies is taking exception to the British report. Janet Shibley Hyde, a psychology professor at the U of Wisconsin, says men and women may have assessed their personalities in ways that conform to gender stereotypes. She also takes exception to how the data was analyzed, saying the results exaggerate small differences which may exist.

More Liberal Bull Shit: Lying To US About Con Fused Gender's And All This Gender Identity Hoop-Law And Nonsense ,Here Proof Financial Decisions: Men Vs. Women

We all know that men and women tend to think differently about most things in life, and financial decisions are no, ummm, different. A recent study by the worldwide research, learning and development organization LIMRA highlights some of those differences. To nobody's surprise, the study found that men differ from women not only in basic areas of financial planning, but also in the decision-making process.

Apparently, men like to be in charge, especially older men. (Who knew?) Only 46% of surveyed men aged fifty or greater said that they shared financial decisions with their spouse, while women of the same age were more inclusive in the process. 67% of the women surveyed said that they shared financial decision-making responsibilities with their spouse.
Perhaps it would be better to leave the women in charge, and the wealthier you are, the more you should consider that advice. Even though only 30% of women surveyed were the primary financial decision-makers in households that had a total net worth of more than $1 million, when women are the primary decision-makers, they are generally more likely to have undertaken fundamental retirement planning activities.
According to LIMRA, women were more likely to have determined their Social Security benefits(76% to 73% for men), outlined their retirement expenses (57% to 55%), estimated the number of years that their assets will last (41% to 38%), determined the likely health care coverage they would need in retirement (44% to 37%), and created a specific strategy to keep income flowing from their savings during retirement (41% to 34%).
Did men excel at anything? Two areas of financial retirement planning were completed more often by men than by women. Men were more likely to determine what their retirement incomes will be (55% to 53%), and by a wide margin of 60% to 44%, men were more likely to have calculated the amount of investment income and assets they would be able to spend in retirement.
The survey seems to imply that men focus on the revenue, while women focus on expenses. That is another good reason why teamwork and cooperation between spouses makes financial planning better — the use of complementary skills.
Without spouses cooperating in the process, unpleasant changes and surprises can follow in retirement. A separate survey from Allianz Life Insurance found that 70% of women change financial advisors after their spouses pass away, which is reasonably consistent with men being unwilling to share in the decision-making process. These women have not built up the same trust with the financial advisor.
A formal plan can help the retirement planning process and keep both spouses and advisors on the same track. Unfortunately, formal plans can be few and far between. Across the sexes, only 25% of survey participants who were primary financial decision-makers had a formal retirement plan.
When a formal retirement income plan is present, survey respondents reported better satisfaction with their financial advisors and expressed greater loyalty. 42% of those with a formal plan expressed advisor satisfaction, approximately three times more than those without a plan.
The bottom line: couples should share the financial decisions and make a formal retirement income plan together, using their complementary skills. Doing so will increase your contentment with your financial advisor, and will likely increase your confidence in your retirement plans as well.
Come on, guys. Just admit that you do not have it all under control and can use some spousal assistance. It will be better for everybody once you do.
This article was provided by our partners at moneytips.com

Al Sharpton, Joy-Ann Reid Remain Huge New York Tax Delinquents

MSNBC national correspondent Joy-Ann Reid has yet to pay off her still open nearly $5,000 tax warrant that attracted a good bit of attention last year. Ditto for the nearly $600,000 for two tax warrants that New York lists for MSNBC host Rev. Al Sharpton.
Here is the backstory.
“In September 2013, New York issued a state tax warrant to Neblett and his wife, Rita Nakouzi, for $46,862.68,” she reported. “Six months later, the state issued an additional warrant to the couple for $12,849.87.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/31/al-sharpton-joy-ann-reid-remain-huge-new-york-tax-delinquents/#ixzz4AGEVlDQS

Cliam: ‘Possible Bias Incident’: Vermont Confused Gender Man Dies After Brutal Beating? Let Fact Check This


A transgender man from Vermont died over the weekend from injuries he sustained during a brutal beating last week at a homeless encampment, the Burlington Police Department said.
Police announced in a press release that 38-year-old Amos Beede, a transient, was found lying on the ground unconscious at 11 a.m. on May 23. It was apparent that she had been assaulted.


Bias Incident?  Fact Check not so fast, home-less are beaten all the time here are 10 story 
t listed below , what it show that being Confused Gender had nothing to with it!

1. Police looking for more suspects in vicious beating of homeless man

2.Man arrested after beating homeless victim to death in Brooklyn’s Highland Park: police

3.Cops: Homeless Man Beaten to Death in Chicago

4.San Diego Teens Held on $1M Each in Homeless Man's Death

5.Homeless Man’s Suspected Killers Seen In San Francisco Surveillance Video

6.ALBUQUERQUE Teens charged with murder of two homeless men

7.  LONDON Man convicted of murder for beating homeless man to death climbed over fence to Buckingham Palace

8.VERY BRUTAL: Hobos Beaten & Murdered By Russian Teens

Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f8a_1308772420#4frhIazYrQdbBOA4.99
9. Brooklyn  Girl, 3, Beaten to Death in Homeless Shelter After Refusing to Eat Soiled Diaper: Source


10.San Jose: Teen arrested in beating death of homeless woman http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_26548209/san-jose-teen-arrested-beating-death-homeless-woman


Saturday, May 28, 2016

America In TRANS-ition: How Obama Activism Turns Feedom Into Fascism

America In TRANS-ition: How Obama Activism Turns Feedom Into Fascism

Image result for obama dictator scum

Freedom doesn’t need reassignment surgery. But the scalpel is out. The anesthesia has been administered.
Tragically, most are asleep.
Overnight, we are witnessing the most radical (and destructive) transformation in America’s legal and cultural landscape than we’ve ever seen before. President Obama has long declared his intentions of “fundamentally transforming the United States of America”. No one realized he meant the change would be of a sexual nature.
We’ve gone from “no one should have a say what goes on in the privacy of someone’s bedroom” to forced conformation through the loss of your job or business, the imposing of steep fines or even the threat of prison. Bow to the rainbow god of LGBTQXYZ activism or you will be assimilated. I thought the Borg were some Star Trek fiction. But it’s the Obama administration and its fascist efforts to silence opposition and demand allegiance to the flag of the united states of LGBT fascism.
The recently fired baseball hall-of-famer, Curt Schilling, should have known better than to think free speech applied to him, personally. He dared to post a meme about transgenderism (not my style at all, but the First Amendment is more important than my own personal messaging preference). Silly conservative. It only applies to the Left as they parade their absolute intolerance through mainstream media, Hollywood, academia, public education, courts of law and now—aggressively—through the Department of (In)Justice.
Attorney General Loretta Lynch invoked Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title IX (as added in the 1972 Educational Amendments to the civil rights bill) in a press conference on C-SPAN attacking North Carolina’s recent House Bill 2, or HB2. She declared that these federal statutes were meant to cover “gender identity” issues because they bar discrimination based on “sex” (although the laws never mention this newly conjured up “gender identity”). Well, if that’s the case, then scholarship-stealing former NAACP chapter president Rachel Dolezal is covered by “race identity”, too. Why can’t white people, who thinks they’re black, apply for any black minority-based scholarship? Who are we to prevent their delusion…I mean, equality?
Lynch, who is adamantly pro-abortion, mentioned how the DOJ is concerned about discrimination against any American. Oh, but not those in the womb. Over 1 million a year have a lack of access to Life, but let’s pretend that the real injustice is the faux LGBT lack-of-access to bathrooms. Never mind that the nation’s largest abortion chain has been caught on video and in documented evidence illegally selling aborted baby body parts for profit. Lynch wasn’t moved, as the nation’s top attorney, to act. But within weeks of #HB2 becoming law, the Civil Rights division of the DOJ moved with lightning speed to protect the “equal rights” of 0.1% of the population.
Lynch says that North Carolina’s common sense #HB2 “presents the problem that does not exist.” We haven’t yet legalized men (whether transgender or not, because those bathroom bills don’t require any proof of such “status") going into girls’ bathrooms and changing rooms on a nationwide scale. Of course, we’ve never seen any articles of men secretly videoing or photographing women in bathrooms or similar facilities. Lynch says “North Carolina’s HB2 is based on distinction without a difference.” Really? No difference? Our sexual anatomy’s the same?
Lynch, like the rest of so-called progressives, compared the “transgender” issue with the struggle for dignity and justice of American blacks. Comparing something that esteemed medical professionals like Dr. Paul McHugh (former psychiatrist-in-chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital) and others call a “mental disorder” is nothing like the irrefutable innate characteristic of skin color. Of course, the deluded NAACP’s leadership agrees that opposing men using women’s bathrooms (or vice versa) is akin to racist support of Jim Crow laws. This, from the organization that recently forgot the actual wording of the First Amendment and sued me (and The Radiance Foundation) for exercising my right to free speech. I accurately called the far-left, pro-abortion organization the “National Association for the Abortion of Colored People” in several of my articles. Thankfully, Alliance Defending Freedom defended my actual civil rights. The NAACP was crushed in court and smacked down by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals for trying to “censor speech it didn’t like.”
Here’s the thing. If we take this twisted liberal “logic” to its illogical conclusion by eradicating gender distinctions, it’s biological women (as if the term “women” needs a qualifier) who will always be harmed the most. Since LGBT activists are hell-bent on pretending that biological binary sex is just a figment of our imagination, let’s just do away with all gender-divided sports, for instance. Men should now be able to play in all women’s sports. Well, actually, there should be no women’s sports—just sports. Gee, I wonder which “gender” will dominate those records? Science has shown repeatedly that even among the most elite of professional athletes, there is a huge gap in performance as evidenced by the 10%-25% difference in world records between men and women.
This isn’t sexism. It’s realism. My wife and I are equal, but we’re not the same. She has a womb. I don’t. And I’m perfectly ok with that. She bore three of our four amazing children. She wins the Trophy of Strength Award for that category, all the way! We’re different, and no amount of political BS (bogus stuff) will change that.
But Obama’s administration is desperately trying to force this nation into having reassignment surgery. Forget the Constitution. Fundamentally transforming America requires ignoring the very thing that makes the United States great. Law. Order. And a rich cultural heritage of Religious Freedom that “hold these truths to be self-evident”.
Apparently, common sense is not evident to this current President and those who work in our Executive Branch. Flagrantly disregarding the fact that they’re not in the legislative branch of government, they act like dictators, twisting the law to suit their gender-confused agenda.
This is no time to sleep, fellow Americans. The surgery is in progress, and it just might be irreversible. This isn’t about loving anyone you want, tolerance, or equality. Love illuminates the truth and lifts people out of their circumstances. Tolerance keeps people where they are and pretends there are no circumstances. (If you think that a perfectly healthy part of your anatomy needs to be cut off, there are definitely some circumstances.) And equality is too precious to have it distorted and defined by those who do all they can to suppress the truth.

The Film ‘Me Before You’ Is Disability Death Porn. That’s why we’re boycotting.

Featured Image

The movie Me Before You will be released in theatres across North America on June 3.
The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition is urging its supporters to boycott Me Before You in order to not give any money to the production of movies that perpetuate the ideology that death is better than living with a disability.
We also urge our supporters to donate the admission price to either: Not Dead Yet (donation), Not Dead Yet UK (donation) or the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition (donation).
This is not a campaign to obstruct free speech, this is a campaign to oppose the "disability death porn" that this movie promotes.
In the Me Before You plot (Will Traynor) a man who was paralysed in an accident, decides to die by assisted suicide at a Swiss suicide clinic. His family, who are incredibly wealthy, hire Louisa Clark, as his care-giver. As the story progresses, Clark falls in love with Traynor, but Traynor has decided that death is better than living with a disability. Traynor dies by assisted suicide in Switzerland and of course he loves Clark so much, that he leaves her an inheritance.
What is most insidious about the movie is that Traynor's death is sold as an act of love. Not only is death portrayed as better than living with a disability, but the ultimate act of love, for a person who lives with a disability, is death. This is a dangerous form of "disability death porn."
People with disabilities are fighting for social and attitudinal change. Me Before You perpetuates the idea, that death is better than living with a disability.
To understand the disability perspective, I urge you to read the comments by people with disabilities concerning Me Before You.

William Peace (center)

The obliviousness here is nothing short of stunning even for a quadriplegic wants to die snuff film. The main character, Will Trayner, is never given a voice. He is a mere foil for Louisa Clark. In a New York Times review of the book the reviewer put it succinctly. William Peace, a Syracuse University professor, known online as Bad Cripple, wrote an excellent article: A Second Class Existence: Me Before You Gets It All Wrong.
Peace writes:
"Lou has never fully lived: Will has, but no longer can... He had scaled rock faces at Yosemite, swum in volcanic springs in Iceland, sampled warm croissants in the Marais and had his pick of glamorous, leggy girlfriends. After the accident, he can't walk, can't feed himself, can't have sex. The only power he believes he retains is the power to end his life; and, as a man of action, he wants to exercise that power". 
This is a first. Will is the first asexual romantic hero who wields his power to die. It is a given, he will die because, well, that is what all people who are not quadriplegics believe. The only quadriplegics that want to live are asexual, bitter, angry people who lash out at all the people foolish enough to engage them. Even when a quadriplegic like Will has it all--he is rich beyond belief, lives a life of luxury and can do pretty much whatever he wants--still chooses to die. Out of the goodness of his soul he will not allow himself to ruin Louisa's life hence after his death he wills her his money. Only Hollywood could come up with such a story line that is so grossly convoluted and devoid of reality. 
Predictably, there are more than a few angry people with a disability who deeply object to the book and film. If the film is a hit, and I believe it will be, there is no doubt organizations such as Compassion and Choices will exploit its popularity to help pass assisted suicide legislation. Multiple people with a disability have already weighed in with scathing words. I doubt their words will resonate beyond the disability rights community but they reinforce I am not alone. Here are a few links: 
The cultural promotion of suicide and assisted suicide was bad enough, now Me Before You and its disability death porn, defines death as an act of love for a person with a disability.
Reprinted with permission from Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.