LIBERALS SIGN PETITION TO IMPOSE 10% “MALE PRIVILEGE TAX” To Fight Sexism Aka Men Ruling Over Women?,

Liberals signed a petition to address “income inequality” by imposing a 10% “male privilege tax” on all men in the latest Mark Dice ‘man on the street’ video which illustrates how much leftists are divorced from reality.

Asked to support an additional 10% tax on men’s income, one woman responded, “I’ll definitely sign for that,” before adding, “Yeah I’ve never heard of that before but whatever they’re trying to do right now is clearly not working so I’m all for giving it a shot.”

Dice then talks to a couple, telling the woman the petition is to “fight sexism in this new world order.” She signs right in front of her boyfriend, who doesn’t dare raise a whimper of dissent.

Two more women sign the petition, with one saying it helps her “feel better,” before adding, “When that actually happens, that would be great though.”

Two men then sign the petition to help with “income inequality,” despite the concerns of a woman standing nearby who remarks, “That’s their problem, let them go out and find a good job, I make more money than my husband.”

“It’s really the final phase in the new world order to help solve a lot of our economic problems,” states Dice, to which the man responds, “Hell yeah!”

“Gotta stop with this male privilege – feminist revolution is really upon us and it’s the final phase in equality,” remarks Dice.

The leftist media promulgates the myth that men are paid more than women because of discrimination, feeding into feminist doctrines about patriarchal systems oppressing women in the workplace.

In reality, the “gender wage gap” of around 19-23 per cent between the two sexes in the United States is explained by a number of reasons that have nothing to do with discrimination, including the fact that men work more hours and men seek less desirable jobs that pay higher.

As a result, men account for 93% of workplace deaths despite being only 54% of the workforce. 94% of workplace suicides every year are also men. The left buries these shockingly high male workplace fatality figures because they completely contradict the myth that the jobs market discriminates against women.

“The gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week,” writes dissident feminist Christina Hoff Sommers. “When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.”

As Sommers explains in the video below, the gender wage gap myth is based on completely bogus statistics.

WASHINGTON POST COLUMNIST: AIR CONDITIONING IS SEXIST Too Now? Liberalism Is Way Out Of Control.

Washington Post columnist Petula Dvorak, the latest example of the evil patriarchy trying to oppress women in the workplace comes in the form of air conditioning, yes air conditioning.

After talking to female office workers in downtown Washington, Dvorak comes to the conclusion that cool AC temperatures represent, “the gender divide, thermostat edition.”

SInce women tend to wear less clothes in summer, they are more likely to complain about feeling cold at work. Dvorak talks to a number of ladies who express their displeasure about being “freezing” in the office.

“Everything is set at 70 degrees for those testosterone-toting people,” one woman told Dvorak, explaining “how frustrating it is to put on a pretty summer outfit and then get hit with that blast of cold.”

Meanwhile, all of the men who spoke to Dvorak said they were comfortable with the temperature. Dvorak also blames men for the AC setting in a female-centric office.

“That’s right, my friends. Air conditioning is another big, sexist plot,” writes Dvorak, whose solution is to turn the temperature up and make men wear shorts.

“Does anyone else find it ironic that feminists are accusing men of secretly stacking the deck against women in order to get them to… put on more clothes?” asks Steven Crowder. “Wouldn’t it be more reasonable to assume that men would more likely crank up the heat to get women to strip down? First step: set thermostat to 91 degrees. Second step: pitch “Casual Bra and Panty Friday.”

“What’s interesting is that Dvorak acknowledges that women are able to wear lighter clothing in the summertime, while men continue to wear suits year round,” notes Cassy Fiano. “Gosh, it’s almost as if the people wearing heavier clothing might be warmer than the women in linen dresses would be! Obviously, this must be a tool of the evil patriarchy!”

People often ask me why I don’t just ignore these kind of stories and concentrate on bigger issues. The problem is that this rhetoric is no longer confined to radical leftists with tumblr blogs – it’s being parroted by major news outlets. These articles get hundreds of thousands of Facebook shares and in some cases are read by millions of people.

Last week we covered two equally insane examples – the man who allows his wife (with whom he has two children) to sleep with other men because he’s a feminist, and another man who feels guilty and embarrassed about enjoying BBQs because they reinforce traditional gender roles and are inherently misogynistic.

What we are seeing is the mainstreaming of lunacy. If this kind of warped thinking is not consistently challenged, it will eventually be accepted as the norm.

http://www.infowars.com/washington-post-columnist-air-conditioning-is-sexist/

FEMINIST: NOT ALLOWING YOUR WIFE TO SLEEP WITH OTHER MEN IS SEXIST

Michael Sonmore allows his wife, with whom he has children aged 3 and 6, to sleep with as many men as she likes, because insisting upon monogamy is “patriarchal oppression”.

In a piece for NYMag.com, Sonmore writes;

“As I write this, my children are asleep in their room, Loretta Lynn is on the stereo, and my wife is out on a date with a man named Paulo. It’s her second date this week; her fourth this month so far. If it goes like the others, she’ll come home in the middle of the night, crawl into bed beside me, and tell me all about how she and Paulo had sex. I won’t explode with anger or seethe with resentment. I’ll tell her it’s a hot story and I’m glad she had fun. It’s hot because she’s excited, and I’m glad because I’m a feminist.”

http://www.infowars.com/feminist-not-allowing-your-wife-to-sleep-with-other-men-is-sexist/

seven Lies Liberals Tell to Silence Christians

The brilliant Christian thinker, philosopher, author and pastor Doug Wilson has a wonderful website that he updates often called“Blog & Mablog: Theology that bites back.” In a post from a few years back he detailed 7 popular liberal myths and memes that are used to silence and berate Christians. The post is as relevant today as it was back when it was first written, and anyone who has ever been accosted by a liberal, anti-Christian troll should really check it out.

In it he quickly debunks these seven memes:

1. The Crusades were totally uncalled for.
2. The battle between Galileo and the Church was a battle between science and faith.
3. The Salem Witch Trials were an example of typical Puritan intolerance.
4. The rise of the secular Enlightenment saved us all from endless religious bloodletting.
5. Darwinian evolution is the Truth.
6. Biblical faith stifles and deadens the aesthetic soul.
7. America was a secular nation in its founding.

All of these are examples of skewed thinking, manipulated history and outright fabrication. Read why from Blog & Mablog.

1. he Crusades were totally uncalled for.

The Crusades were actually a long overdue defensive reaction to many years of Muslim belligerence, militarism, agressiveness, and provocation. If a “crusade” is an unprovoked military attack on religious grounds, then we need to start speaking of the Muslim Crusades. One could, however, criticize Christian Europe for being so slow to respond.

3. The Salem Witch Trials were an example of typical Puritan intolerance.

Aktcherly, what went down was this. The charter for Massachusetts expired, and so they had no legal government. The colony sent somebody back to England to get the charter renewed. While he was gone away, the witch hysteria broke out in Salem, and the rest of the colony had no legal means to suppress it. When the emissary returned and legal government was restored, the colony acted, with the support of the Puritan ministers throughout the colony. But by then, the damage was done and Puritans everywhere were tagged with a guilt that they had conscientiously opposed.

 http://freedomforce.com/4875/seven-lies-liberals-tell-to-silence-christians/

Gay Fascism, Michael Swift's Gay Manifesto was first published in February 1987 and was titled "Gay Revolutionary.

We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.

Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.

All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men.

All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.

If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.

We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.

Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.

We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.

There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled.

We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.

The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence--will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.

All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.

The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.

We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.

We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.

Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks.
http://www.blessedcause.org/protest/Gay%20Manifesto.htm

Obama Want Brth Profiling’ Of Your Kids, Now?

There is no doubt that the socialist led public school system in America has been steadily invading more our privacy than ever before and most of it is none of their business.

It’s common knowledge that many schools throughout the land monitor the social media pages of their students. There have been a number of times where schools have disciplined students for things they have done on their own time away from school that has nothing to do with school. This is evidence of the socialist mantra that the government, of which the public schools are a part of, believe that your kids belong to them and not to you.

Many public schools have aligned themselves with Planned Parenthood which totally subverts parental authority. They teach our kids that sex outside of marriage and at ages as young as 10 to 12 years of age is okay as long as the take precautions to prevent catching diseases. Part of that teaching is instructing them they don’t have to tell their parents what they are doing. They will also hand out contraception such as condoms to your kids without your knowledge or permission. Planned Parenthood even helps young minor aged girls to get an abortion without informing the parents or obtaining their permission by using loopholes in the laws.

Now it seems some schools might be using some form of what I refer to as ‘birth profiling’ of your kids.

Cara Paiuk’s son Aiven will be attending kindergarten this fall at Aiken Elementary School in West Hartford, Connecticut. When she went to enroll him, she was taken aback by some of the information the enrollment form was asking of her about the birth history of her son. They wanted to know if there were any pregnancy problems, whether the birth was vaginal or Cesarean, were there any problems at the time of birth or in the first week afterwards and if the child came home from the hospital at the same the mom did.

image: http://cdn1.godfatherpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/birth-profiling-questions.jpg

Paiuk told the media of her response when she saw the birth history question on the enrollment form that her son was holding:

“I ripped it out of his hands and said, ‘You can’t answer that, it’s none of their business, This is kindergarten, and they want to know about my vagina! I don’t understand — there’s no correlation between the two for me.”

When she contacted the school about the question, they told her that they needed to know things like if the umbilical cord was wrapped around the baby’s neck during birth or if there was an emergency C-section in case any issues arose at the school. Pauik responded:

“I thought it was BS. Yes, birth trauma can result in developmental delays or disability, but that can happen through vaginal birth or a C-section. And if there are delays or disabilities, shouldn’t that be diagnosed by a doctor, not an administrator? Wouldn’t it be crazy if I thought something was wrong with your child and went back and looked at a form and said ‘Oh, it’s because she had a C-section’?”

The school’s outside medical advisor told Paiuk that the form had been in use for at least 20 years and they never had a complaint until now. That didn’t appease her as she told the media:

“Let’s say it was added 30 years ago, there weren’t that many C-sections then, so maybe it might have been indicative of a birth trauma. You might have been able to justify the question 30 years ago. But now there’s such a higher rate of C-sections that it’s not immediately indicative of birth trauma or developmental delay. The fact that this has continued for all these years just tells me that people are blindly filling out forms these days.”

I believe Paiuk hit the nail on the head that people have been blindly filling out the form for years not realizing just how much personal information they are giving the schools who really don’t have any right to know. The more the schools and government know about you, your kids and your personal lives, the easier it is for them to manipulate you and your kids into accepting their socialistic ideology.

With all of the wacko psychologists working with the public schools, it wouldn’t surprise me if they weren’t compiling that birth history data and using it to do ‘birth profiles’ on kids, trying to link not only learning related issues to their births but other issues as well. It’s ironic that law enforcement is not allowed to use any form of racial profiling but schools will be allowed to use birth profiling with our kids.

Sponsored by RevContent

Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/23499/are-public-schools-birth-profiling-your-kids/#g8iB820dvZsSQ1r5.99

Human Genetic Engineering Stem Cells and Same Sex Reproduction

As genetics allows us to turn the tide on human disease, it's also granting the power to engineer desirable traits into humans. What limits should we create as this technology develops?

Stem cells have generated such an enormous amount of interest, in part, because of their applications related to areas such as fertility and genetics. In that same light, their interest for solving reproductive challenges has also generated a great deal of controversy. This is particularly true in the application of stem cells to facilitate reproduction for gay couples.

At present, there are a number of research laboratories that are focused on the creation of cells that are genetically male but have been produced from eggs. Alternately, they are also trying to create sperm from female eggs. If the research proves to work, the consequences are particularly important for gay and lesbian couples that wish to have children. The idea is, however, an extremely controversial one that mixes in with politics, religion and ethics. Many individuals oppose same-sex reproduction while gay and lesbian couples - as well as heterosexual members of the public - argue that gay persons should have the right to produce and raise biological children if the opportunity becomes available.

Current Research for Same Sex Reproduction

The techniques purported to allow same-sex reproduction have yet to be successful but they do hold promise. They include methods of cellular reprogramming and even techniques such as artificial chromosomes. While they have not been shown to work at present, they do hold potential for the future of same-sex reproduction. One particular technique involves the creation of sperm from human stem cells. In a recent experiment, bone marrow stem cells were extracted from men and they were then triggered into spermatogonia. These cells are able to develop into immature sperm cells. The experiment was widely reported in the news but has not yet been published or successfully replicated.

Current Research for Same Sex Reproduction

The techniques purported to allow same-sex reproduction have yet to be successful but they do hold promise. They include methods of cellular reprogramming and even techniques such as artificial chromosomes. While they have not been shown to work at present, they do hold potential for the future of same-sex reproduction. One particular technique involves the creation of sperm from human stem cells. In a recent experiment, bone marrow stem cells were extracted from men and they were then triggered into spermatogonia. These cells are able to develop into immature sperm cells. The experiment was widely reported in the news but has not yet been published or successfully replicated

n another experiment, spermatogonia were triggered to begin meiosis after being cultured with cells known as Sertoli cells. These cells are found in the testes and are important because they support developing sperm. While the research team for this particular experiment has yet to obtain these kinds of results with the production of eggs, a team in Brazil does cite that they have created sperm and eggs from embryonic stem cells. Whether or not the eggs can actually produce viable offspring, however, is the most vital aspect of this type of experimentation. Still, the work does still show that potential for same-sex reproduction exists, and it will likely spur further research in this area.

Safety Concerns

Safety is a key aspect of stem cell research - this aspect is more important than ever when addressing the potential for same-sex reproduction. When cells are triggered into change, there is the possibility that they grow uncontrolled and are more likely to lead to cancer. The enormity of the cell modification that occurs to create female sperm is also of concern, especially with regards to any chromosomal abnormalities or problems that can occur through the use of artificial chromosomes.

Controversy of Stem Cells and Same Sex Reproduction

Unfortunately, the pathway to realistically providing the techniques to support same-sex reproduction is a complicated one in terms of political, religious and ethical controversy. Most conservative religious groups are strongly opposed to same-sex relationships, so it follows without surprise that they are against same-sex reproduction. This means that even if same-sex reproduction becomes a successful reality, there are still numerous hurdles to overcome before the techniques can actually be put into practice.
http://www.explorestemcells.co.uk/stem-cells-same-sex-reproduction.html