Monday, July 6, 2015

Obama Want Brth Profiling’ Of Your Kids, Now?





There is no doubt that the socialist led public school system in America has been steadily invading more our privacy than ever before and most of it is none of their business.



It’s common knowledge that many schools throughout the land monitor the social media pages of their students. There have been a number of times where schools have disciplined students for things they have done on their own time away from school that has nothing to do with school. This is evidence of the socialist mantra that the government, of which the public schools are a part of, believe that your kids belong to them and not to you.

Many public schools have aligned themselves with Planned Parenthood which totally subverts parental authority. They teach our kids that sex outside of marriage and at ages as young as 10 to 12 years of age is okay as long as the take precautions to prevent catching diseases. Part of that teaching is instructing them they don’t have to tell their parents what they are doing. They will also hand out contraception such as condoms to your kids without your knowledge or permission. Planned Parenthood even helps young minor aged girls to get an abortion without informing the parents or obtaining their permission by using loopholes in the laws.
Now it seems some schools might be using some form of what I refer to as ‘birth profiling’ of your kids.

Cara Paiuk’s son Aiven will be attending kindergarten this fall at Aiken Elementary School in West Hartford, Connecticut. When she went to enroll him, she was taken aback by some of the information the enrollment form was asking of her about the birth history of her son. They wanted to know if there were any pregnancy problems, whether the birth was vaginal or Cesarean, were there any problems at the time of birth or in the first week afterwards and if the child came home from the hospital at the same the mom did.
image: http://cdn1.godfatherpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/birth-profiling-questions.jpg
birth profiling questions

Paiuk told the media of her response when she saw the birth history question on the enrollment form that her son was holding:


“I ripped it out of his hands and said, ‘You can’t answer that, it’s none of their business, This is kindergarten, and they want to know about my vagina! I don’t understand — there’s no correlation between the two for me.”
When she contacted the school about the question, they told her that they needed to know things like if the umbilical cord was wrapped around the baby’s neck during birth or if there was an emergency C-section in case any issues arose at the school. Pauik responded:
“I thought it was BS. Yes, birth trauma can result in developmental delays or disability, but that can happen through vaginal birth or a C-section. And if there are delays or disabilities, shouldn’t that be diagnosed by a doctor, not an administrator? Wouldn’t it be crazy if I thought something was wrong with your child and went back and looked at a form and said ‘Oh, it’s because she had a C-section’?”
The school’s outside medical advisor told Paiuk that the form had been in use for at least 20 years and they never had a complaint until now. That didn’t appease her as she told the media:
“Let’s say it was added 30 years ago, there weren’t that many C-sections then, so maybe it might have been indicative of a birth trauma. You might have been able to justify the question 30 years ago. But now there’s such a higher rate of C-sections that it’s not immediately indicative of birth trauma or developmental delay. The fact that this has continued for all these years just tells me that people are blindly filling out forms these days.”

I believe Paiuk hit the nail on the head that people have been blindly filling out the form for years not realizing just how much personal information they are giving the schools who really don’t have any right to know. The more the schools and government know about you, your kids and your personal lives, the easier it is for them to manipulate you and your kids into accepting their socialistic ideology.

With all of the wacko psychologists working with the public schools, it wouldn’t surprise me if they weren’t compiling that birth history data and using it to do ‘birth profiles’ on kids, trying to link not only learning related issues to their births but other issues as well. It’s ironic that law enforcement is not allowed to use any form of racial profiling but schools will be allowed to use birth profiling with our kids.
Sponsored by RevContent


Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/23499/are-public-schools-birth-profiling-your-kids/#g8iB820dvZsSQ1r5.99

Sunday, July 5, 2015

Human Genetic Engineering Stem Cells and Same Sex Reproduction

As genetics allows us to turn the tide on human disease, it's also granting the power to engineer desirable traits into humans. What limits should we create as this technology develops?



Stem cells have generated such an enormous amount of interest, in part, because of their applications related to areas such as fertility and genetics. In that same light, their interest for solving reproductive challenges has also generated a great deal of controversy. This is particularly true in the application of stem cells to facilitate reproduction for gay couples.
At present, there are a number of research laboratories that are focused on the creation of cells that are genetically male but have been produced from eggs. Alternately, they are also trying to create sperm from female eggs. If the research proves to work, the consequences are particularly important for gay and lesbian couples that wish to have children. The idea is, however, an extremely controversial one that mixes in with politics, religion and ethics. Many individuals oppose same-sex reproduction while gay and lesbian couples - as well as heterosexual members of the public - argue that gay persons should have the right to produce and raise biological children if the opportunity becomes available.

Current Research for Same Sex Reproduction

The techniques purported to allow same-sex reproduction have yet to be successful but they do hold promise. They include methods of cellular reprogramming and even techniques such as artificial chromosomes. While they have not been shown to work at present, they do hold potential for the future of same-sex reproduction. One particular technique involves the creation of sperm from human stem cells. In a recent experiment, bone marrow stem cells were extracted from men and they were then triggered into spermatogonia. These cells are able to develop into immature sperm cells. The experiment was widely reported in the news but has not yet been published or successfully replicated.

Current Research for Same Sex Reproduction

The techniques purported to allow same-sex reproduction have yet to be successful but they do hold promise. They include methods of cellular reprogramming and even techniques such as artificial chromosomes. While they have not been shown to work at present, they do hold potential for the future of same-sex reproduction. One particular technique involves the creation of sperm from human stem cells. In a recent experiment, bone marrow stem cells were extracted from men and they were then triggered into spermatogonia. These cells are able to develop into immature sperm cells. The experiment was widely reported in the news but has not yet been published or successfully replicated

n another experiment, spermatogonia were triggered to begin meiosis after being cultured with cells known as Sertoli cells. These cells are found in the testes and are important because they support developing sperm. While the research team for this particular experiment has yet to obtain these kinds of results with the production of eggs, a team in Brazil does cite that they have created sperm and eggs from embryonic stem cells. Whether or not the eggs can actually produce viable offspring, however, is the most vital aspect of this type of experimentation. Still, the work does still show that potential for same-sex reproduction exists, and it will likely spur further research in this area.

Safety Concerns

Safety is a key aspect of stem cell research - this aspect is more important than ever when addressing the potential for same-sex reproduction. When cells are triggered into change, there is the possibility that they grow uncontrolled and are more likely to lead to cancer. The enormity of the cell modification that occurs to create female sperm is also of concern, especially with regards to any chromosomal abnormalities or problems that can occur through the use of artificial chromosomes.

Controversy of Stem Cells and Same Sex Reproduction

Unfortunately, the pathway to realistically providing the techniques to support same-sex reproduction is a complicated one in terms of political, religious and ethical controversy. Most conservative religious groups are strongly opposed to same-sex relationships, so it follows without surprise that they are against same-sex reproduction. This means that even if same-sex reproduction becomes a successful reality, there are still numerous hurdles to overcome before the techniques can actually be put into practice.
http://www.explorestemcells.co.uk/stem-cells-same-sex-reproduction.html

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Homeland Security: Give Confused Gender Illegal Alien Detainees Their Choice of 'Undergarments'









- After six months of study, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, a division of the Department of Homeland Security, has issued new guidelines on how to care for transgender illegal aliens who end up in detention facilities, awaiting possible deportation.

The goal of the Transgender Care Memorandum is to provide a "respectful, safe and secure environment for all detainees, including those individuals who identify as transgender."

Among the questions to be asked of men who identify as women or vice-versa: "Do you prefer to wear male or female clothing?" "Are there any specific clothing items (e.g. undergarments) that you need that you have not been provided?"

(An attachment to the guidance notes, "The detention standards do not restrict the provision of gender-appropriate clothing. In general, brassieres should be provided to individuals who request them, as appropriate.")

Other questions for transgender detainees include, "Would you feel safer being housed in a cell with someone else or by yourself?" "Do you have a preference for whether a male or female staff member searches you?"

When there are questions about an illegal alien's gender identity, ICE intake officials are instructed to ask, right at the start, "Do you wish to disclose your gender identity?"

If the detainee identifies as transgender or has a gender identity different from his or her biological sex, ICE officials shall record that determination in the appropriate data systems.

The guidelines state, "The detainee shall not be disciplined for refusing to answer any gender-identity related questions during processing, for not disclosing complete information in response to questions asked about gender identity, or for falsely reporting that he or she is not transgender."

Transgender detainees who were already receiving hormone therapy when taken into ICE custody will continue getting it; and all transgender detainees must have access to mental health care and medication such as hormone therapy based on medical need.

The guidelines also expand the ICE bureaucracy.

ICE detention facilities must create and operate a Transgender Classification and Care Committee (TCCC), which will write an individualized detention plan for each transgender detainee.

And supervisory LGBTI Field Liaisons will be appointed to "regularly communicate" with a new national Enforcement and Removal Operations LGBTI Coordinator, who will report on the progress of implementing the new guidelines.

“The Transgender Care Memorandum reaffirms ICE’s commitment to provide a safe, secure, and respectful environment for all those in our custody, including those individuals who identify as transgender,” said ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Assistant Director Thomas Homan.

“We want to make sure our employees have the tools and resources available to learn more about how to interact with transgender individuals and ensure effective standards exist to house and care for them throughout the custody cycle.”

Saturday, June 27, 2015

Top 10 Things Liberals Want To Ban

the-liberals-are-out-control-obama-politics-1341824528.jpg (640×432)




Our Constitution and Bill of Rights established a democratic republic which has stood the tests of time and made us the envy of the world. Because, freedom. Boom. We can say what we want, we can worship whom we please, and we are pursuing happiness like nobody’s business.
Except liberals. It’s like they don’t even understand the concept of “happiness.” More like “misery.” “What can we find to be outraged about today?” is the liberal mantra. Sometimes – though few – the outrage is merited. Most other times… it’s just intellectual self-gratification.

Like things liberals want to ban, for example. Ban all the things! Ridiculous. Don’t believe me? Check out this list:
1. Happy Meal toys – This is not a joke. Leave it to California to ruin one of your happiest childhood memories. (Sure they’re a choking hazard, but that’s the price of fun). They say separating toys from Happy Meals “prevents restaurants from preying on children’s love of toys” and “breaks the link between unhealthy food and prizes.” Uh, guys. If you’re taking your kid to McD’s, expecting them to eat a healthy meal… we’re just fascinated that you were capable of procreation.

2. Plastic bags – For the environment! Except, welllllll… refusing to give you plastic bags in the checkout line may actually be harming the environment. Studies repeatedly show that when Walmart doesn’t give you plastic bags – you buy them. Lots of them. Whoops.
PlasticBagPuppy
3. “Bossy” – And “welfare.” And “illegal.” And “thug.” And “dinosaur.” BECAUSE THEY’RE NOT NICE WORDS AND THEY MIGHT HURT SOMEBODY’S FEELINGS, OKAY?!
giphy
4. Books – Because sausages and pigs can be offensive. So no putting either in our children’s books. Best they never see little piggies. Ever. Really, Oxford University Press?
giphy-3
5. Water guns – They make kids violent! Or something. The Boy Scouts have banned water gun battles (the epitome of childhood summer fun) because they’re not kind. Not kind at all. And water balloons? Not allowed to be any bigger than a ping-pong ball. Might as well have an egg fight. More fun.
giphy-4
6. College football – Seriously. Liberals want to ban college football. For health reasons. Which begs the question… would the NFL be next on the chopping block? Because then that is NOT OKAY. Step away from the pigskin… or I just might have to shoot you with my water pistol.
giphy-5
7.  The Pledge of Allegiance – Talk about irresponsible and unpatriotic. This one’s the worst. What exactly is so wrong with instilling national pride in our youngsters? When did it become a bad thing to be proud to be an American? Sheesh.
giphy-6
8.  Candles – And air fresheners. Nevada attempted to pull this one because the “fragrance is annoying” to some people. *eyeroll* But get this: New York takes the cake. Literally. The libs up there want to take away your birthday cake’s candlesAnd mandate cupcakes. Will the madness never end?
giphy-7
9.  Goldfish – The “only pet I’m allowed to have” crowd would suffer a huge blow if liberals win this one. Did you know that bowl is causing your goldfish “inhumane suffering?” Just make sure you don’t tell them about the last one you sent for a final swim down your toilet bowl…
giphy-8
10.  Prayer – The age-old battle of religious freedom continues. You thought we were guaranteed freedom of religion? Eh. Not so much. High school students can’t even pray during their free time anymore.
giphy-9
What did we miss? What are liberals trying to ban in your neighborhood? Sound off in the comments below!

http://www.westernjournalism.com/top-10-things-liberals-want-to-ban/?utm_campaign=54ebe14371e7fc692400399a&utm_source=BoomTrain&utm_medium=email&utm_content=recommended&bt_alias=eyJ1c2VySWQiOiJiN2JjNGIyMC0xMTIzLTRmZTYtOWJkNi0xNDA5MzYwMWE1NjIifQ%3D%3D

Friday, June 26, 2015

Four Different Planned Parenthood Gay Democrat Supporting Clinics Agree To Accept Donations Earmarked For Killing Black babies

The baby-killing mill that calls itself Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger, an eugenicist.
Eugenics is the belief and practice at improving the genetic quality of the human population through the promotion of higher reproduction of people with desired traits, and reduced reproduction of people with less-desirable traits.
In July 2009, in a Sunday New York Times interview, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said:
Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe [v. Wade] was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.
Now, an investigative report by the pro-life organization Live Action reveals the same eugenic racism also animates Planned Parenthood.
Although the abortion mill is vocal about “Black lives matter” and condemns white police officers in Ferguson and elsewhere for allegedly targeting and killing unarmed blacks, Planned Parenthood gladly accepts donations specifically earmarked for the abortion of black babies.
An undercover investigator from Live Action called four Planned Parenthood (PP) offices — in Idaho, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Ohio —  posing as a potential donor. In each bone-chilling call, he made his anti-black sentiments very clear. In each case, the PP representative enthusiastically told him PP would earmark his donation to specifically abort black babies.
As you read the transcripts of those phonecalls, just remember the subject is the deliberateMURDER of human beings, albeit tiny human beings. Then ask yourself how Planned Parenthood is any better than Nazi German holocaust.
The following is the transcript from Live Action’s audio tape of the call between the “donor” and Autumn Kersey, director of development of Planned Parenthood of Idaho.
Sound of phone ringing . . . .
PP: Good afternoon, this is Autumn.
“Donor”: Hello, Autumn. I’m interested in making a donation today.
PP: Fantastic!
Donor: What about abortions for the underprivileged minority groups? I want to specify that abortion to help a minority group. Would that be possible?
PP: Absolutely
Donor: Like the black community for example?
PP: Certainly
Donor: OK. So, so the abortion could, could be, you know, I could give money specifically for a black baby that would, that’d be the purpose.
PP: Yeah, absolutely. Um, if you wanted to designate that you wanted your gift to be used to help an African-American woman in need, um, then we would certainly, uh, make sure that that gift was earmarked specifically for that purpose.
Donor: Great. Because I really face trouble with affirmative action, and I don’t want my kids being disadvantaged, you know, against, um, black kids. I just had a baby, I want to put it in his name, you know.
PP: Hmm.
Donor: Um, you know ….
PP: Absolutely, that’s fantastic.
Donor: So that’s, that’s definitely possible?
PP: Oh, always, always.
Donor: You know, we just think, you know, the the the less, the less black kids out, the better.
PP: [laughs] Understandable, understandable. Alright, um, excuse my hesitation. I’m, I’m, this is the first time I’ve had a donor call and ask, make this kind of request, so I’m excited, and I’m, I want to make sure I don’t leave anything out.
Live Action’s undercover investigation also called Planned Parenthood of New Mexico and spoke to Irene Gray, director of development. Here’s the transcript of their phone conversation:
PP: Hello, this is Irene.
Donor: Hi, um, I’m interested in, um, making a donation? I’d like to fund one abortion.
PP: Oh, OK!
Donor: I was wondering if that would be possible.
PP: Yes, we can definitely put that….
Donor: Um, can I make the donation specifically for a minority group?
PP: Like a specific group of color?
Donor: Yeah, yeah.
PP: Like, a group of ….
Donor: I mean, like, I want the abortion to be for an African-American baby.
PP: OK.
Donor: And, I was wondering if that could be possible?
PP: The exact amount that we charge, right now, is $450 for an abortion.
Donor: OK. $450?
PP: Mm, hm. And, uh, we can definitely designate it for an African-American.
Donor: Wonderful! Um, if I wanted to fund multiple abortions, could you also specify that this could be done for, um, a specific group?
PP: Hmm.
Donor: Great, great. Um, well, little excited, you know, because I really face trouble with affirmative action, and I don’t want my kids to be, um, uh, disadvantaged, um, you know….
PP: Yeah.
Donor: Against, against, um, against blacks with, in college and, you know, the less, um, the less blacks out there, the better, so….
PP: Yeah, yeah, it’s a strange time for sure. [Laughs]
Donor: Yeah.
PP: So, OK.
Donor: Thank you so much.
PP: No problem!
Donor: And you’ll be receiving a check in a few days!
Here’s the transcript of the phone conversation between Live Action’s undercover investigator (“donor”) and Sue Riggs, vice president of development of Planned Parenthood of Oklahoma:
PP: Hello, this is Sue. May I help you?
Donor: Hi! Uh, Sue, I’m interested in making a donation?
PP: Great!
Donor: So, could, could, would it be possible for me to donate that money specifically for these, these minority groups, so that they could have access to abortions?
PP: Yes, it would be.
Donor: Wonderful. Then could I specify that abortion be done, uh, those abortions be done for a specific minority group, or how does that work?
PP: If you wish, you can.
Donor: OK. So, so, for example, the black community in Tulsa. Would it be possible to give the money specifically for that?
PP: You sure can.
Donor: Wonderful. Great. The abortions will be done specifically for the, the black community abortions.
PP: I can, I will mark it in such a way that definitely it will.
Donor: On a black baby?
PP: Yes.
Donor: Thank you, great.
PP: OK?
Donor: Uh, so, can I give you my credit card number?
PP: Yes.
Here is the transcript of the phone conversation between “Donor” and Lisa Hutton, administrative assistant of Planned Parenthood of Ohio:
PP: Planned Parenthood administration, this is Lisa.
Donor: And who am I speaking with now?
PP: My name is Lisa Hutton.
Donor: Lisa Hutton, what’s your position?
PP: Administrative assistant.
Donor: OK. When I underwrite abortions, does that apply to minorities too?
PP: If you specifically want it to underwrite an abortion for a minority person, you can target it that way. You can, you can specify that that’s how you want it spent.
Donor: OK, yeah, ’cause there’s, so, there’s definitely way too many black people in Ohio, so I’m just trying to do my part.
PP: [Laughs] OK. Whatever.
Donor: Well, blacks especially need abortions too. So that’s what I’m trying to do.
PP: Well, for whatever reason, we’ll accept the money.
You can listen to the audio tape of the above 4 phone conversations by going to Live Action’s Facebook page.
871 black babies are aborted every day in the United States (Guttmacher Institute), but not a word from the Reverends from Hell Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, or from the black president and black first lady in the White House. Don’t black lives matter?
Lila Rose
God bless you, Lila Rose!
Live Action is a youth-led pro-life non-profit organization founded in 2004 by a 15-year-old Catholic girl named Lila Rose, Rose, now 26, remains Live Action’s president. Live Action has undertaken many undercover investigations of late-term abortion doctors and of Planned Parenthood’s racist and sex-selective abortions and sex trafficking. Rose has received many recognitions and awards, including being included by National Journal in their 2013 list of “The 25 Most Influential Washington Women Under 35.”
H/t Live News
See also:
~Éowyn
Dr. Eowyn’s post first appeared at Fellowship of the Minds.
alveda-king-planned-parenthood-from-back-of-bus-to-the-abortion-clinic

Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/03/05/four-different-planned-parenthood-clinics-agree-to-accept-donations-earmarked-for-aborting-black-babies/