Monday, January 30, 2017
Thursday, January 26, 2017
Unhinged Male lLberal Gets vVolent With Conservative Female! So How Is Empowerment Of Women And Girl's Being Apply Here? Or A Better Question, Were Dose Qquity For Women Come In Play Here? , But The real Question Here IS, Why Is Gender Equality M.I.A?
A member of a liberal student group at West Virginia University got violent with members of a conservative group on campus — and a video of the altercation is quickly gaining attention.
The video contains two clips: The first shows members of the conservative Turning Point USA chapter being told to leave a meeting of the college’s Left Alliance on Wednesday. A Turning Point member replies, “That’s real inclusive. We just wanted to learn more about your organization, but if you’re gonna force us to leave—” A bearded member of the Left Alliance wearing a baseball cap then says, “Yeah, you guys should go.”
But the second clip shows that same bearded student from the Left Alliance lunging toward a female conservative student outside the meeting, getting in her face and loudly asking: “Why did you film our f***ing meeting?”
The bearded student claims the Turning Point students were “not allowed” in the Left Alliance meeting and then gets even more unhinged.
“F*** you, you f***ing conservative,” he says before trying to take the student’s cellphone: “Give me your f***ing phone. … Do not f***ing film us.”
Here are the two clips together in one video. (Content warning: Strong language):
Kaitlynn Critchfield of the Turning Point group told TheBlaze Thursday that members of her group tried sitting in during the meeting to find out where the Left Alliance would be setting up display tables to pass out literature in a free-speech zone so Turning Point could set up next to them. Critchfield added she also wanted to invite the Left Alliance’s president to debate a member of Turning Point,
About two minutes later, Critchfield said she and other Turning Point members were walking away from the meeting when the bearded student came running after them. Critchfield said the bearded student “pushed me into a wall” and tried wrestling her cellphone out of her hand. After other Turning Point members helped “get him off of me,” Critchfield said another Turning Point member began recording — which is the second clip.
Critchfield added that Turning Point members reported the incident to police and showed them video. She said police then pulled the bearded student out of the Left Alliance meeting and took a statement from him.
WVU campus police on Thursday said the college’s communications office would be responding to TheBlaze’s request for information. TheBlaze on Thursday didn’t immediately hear back from the office after requesting information.
(H/T: The College Fix)
Tuesday, January 24, 2017
Sunday, January 22, 2017
,Here Are 17 Pictures From Inside The Obama ‘Peaceful’ Protest On Inauguration Day
As Donald J. Trump was sworn in on the steps of the U.S. Capitol as the 45th President, hundreds of masked protesters went on a rampage throughout downtown Washington, D.C.
Police in riot gear attempted to maintain order with pepper spray and concussion “Flashbang” grenades whilst being attacked with bricks that were pulled from the sidewalk.
The protesters torched private cars, attacked Trump supporters, and lit fires in the street. These photos taken inside of the protest show the chaos that erupted in the streets of the nation’s capitol.
A concussion grenade explodes among protesters and reporters – Daily Caller – Grae Stafford
A protester chokes a Trump supporter as they attempt to steal his – Daily Caller – Grae Stafford
Bricks being pulled from the sidewalk on K steet during the protest – Daily Caller – Grae Stafford
Limousine window smashed by protesters – Daily Caller – Abbey Jaroma
Protester carrying bricks pulled from the sidewalk to throw at the police – Daily Caller – Abbey Jaroma
Bricks being thrown at police by protesters – Daily Caller – Grae Stafford
Police using concussion grenades – Daily Caller – Grae Stafford
Protesters fleeing from concussion grenades thrown by police – Daily Caller – Grae Stafford
National Guardsman reacts to a police concussion grenade – Daily Caller – Abbey Jaroma
Crowds fleeing through downtown as police advance – Daily Caller – Abbey Jaroma
Riot police in position during the protest – Daily Caller – Abbey Jaroma
Protesters set fire to inauguration shirts in the streets – Daily Caller – Abbey Jaroma
Protesters pose on top of a vandalised limosine – Daily Caller – Abbey Jaroma
Heavily armored riot police prepare for protesters – Daily Caller – Abbey Jaroma
Masked protester on the streets of Washington DC. – Daily Caller – Abbey Jaroma
Protester speaks to a National Guard soldier on a security line – Daily Caller – Abbey Jaroma
Slogans spray painted on a metro bus shelter – Daily Caller – Abbey Jaroma
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/22/here-are-17-pictures-from-inside-the-peaceful-protest-on-inauguration-day/#ixzz4WXOUAPLJ
Saturday, January 21, 2017
Friday, January 20, 2017
Thursday, January 19, 2017
‘Is God a White Supremacist?’:Islamic Religion class at elite college tackles ‘transnational whiteness
Muslimism, IS The Same As Liberalism, It's a mental disorder
Issue: This The God Of Israel , Being Call A Racist , Bye A Follower Of Muhammad, The Answer IS Yes. If You Break One Law in The Bible , you broken Them all and so, your this going to die in your sin:
Man Is Not To Change What God Says
Man does not have the authority to change the will of God on any subject. We have been given severe warnings in several places in the Bible concerning any changes that we try to make to God's word. As we have already seen in Galatians 1:6-9, if we pervert the gospel by changing it, we will be accursed.
Another such warning comes in the closing verses of the Bible. Revelation 22:18-19 says, "For I testify unto everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book, if anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book; And if anyone takes away from the words of this book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part from the Book of Life, and from the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book." These are very stern warnings that should get our undivided attention.
A prestigious Philadelphia-area college is offering a religion class titled, “Is God a White Supremacist?”
“Is God a White Supremacist?” is taught by Tariq al-Jamil, an associate professor of religion, chair of the religion department and coordinator of Islamic Studies Program. Educated at Harvard and Princeton, al-Jamil’s profile describes him as an “expert on medieval Islamic social history and law.”
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/01/19/is-god-a-white-supremacist-religion-class-at-elite-college-tackles-transnational-whiteness/
Tuesday, January 17, 2017
Monday, January 16, 2017
Monday, January 9, 2017
A Complete Timeline of Race Relations Under -Racial-Healing-Master Barack Obama
Obama marketed himself to the American people as penicillin to the nation’s racial woes. A vote for Obama was a vote for unity! How could you vote against that?
And so, a self-serving slice of the electorate indulged their virtuous exigencies, casting their ballot for what they perceived to be “something bigger.” Obama’s gleeful cry for “hope and change.”
Prior to the Obama presidency, President George W. Bush united Americans as… Americans through 9/11. He kept us safe, and unapologetically defended our common values of freedom and self-governance. But according to our national media, race relations prior to Obama’s presidency were like our healthcare system. Worse than Zimbabwe’s.
How successful was President Obama in mending these supposedly broken bonds? Here’s a comprehensive timeline of all the racial healing in the past eight years.
President Obama’s first headline hobnob with race-in-America dates back to the early days of his presidency. In 2009, Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates arrived home to find his front door lock jammed. He opted to force his way in through the back door. Worried neighbors weren’t sure what was happening, and in good faith alerted the police.
Upon arrival, the officers – one of whom was black – asked Gates for ID, to which Gates then infuriatingly exploded, accusing the officers of racial profiling. “This is what it means to be black in America! ... Do you even know how many graduate degrees I have! Do you know who you’re dealing with here!? ... I’m a professor at Harvard. CAN YOU EVEN SPELL HARVARD?”
The befuddled, browbeaten officer arrested Gates on charges of disorderly conduct for his shrieking tirade.
The newly elected President disregarded the facts, kicking off what would be a long 8 years of poisonous rhetoric aimed at law enforcement. Joining the Cambridge coterie in haranguing the white working-class officer, Obama said: “he acted stupidly.”
Fast forward three years, and the glare of the national spotlight is on Sanford, Florida. In February of 2012, Hispanic-American George Zimmerman – leader of his community’s neighborhood watch – saw a young black man, Trayvon Martin, lurking around his community. Zimmerman called the police, reporting that the man appeared to be on drugs (autopsy confirmed this) and was urinating in front of a house.
After being instructed not to pursue the suspect, Zimmerman hung up. The initial confrontation between the two remains a mystery. However, all the available evidence aligned with Zimmerman's claim that Martin attacked him, knocking him to the ground. Jumping on top of him, Martin allegedly began beating Zimmerman, pounding his head into the pavement. Zimmerman subsequently reached for his gun, and shot Martin, killing him.
America’s racial-healer-in-chief Barack Obama responded to the incident, saying “if I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.” Busy acting as the pillars for Obama’s skewed racial narrative, the media failed to ask why exactly the President’s son would be high, lurking around neighborhoods and beating heads onto pavements.
When Zimmerman was acquitted of all charges, riots broke out across the country. Police cars were smashed and stomped on; windows were broken. A random white guy was robbed, the assailants yelling “this is for Trayvon!”
In November 2013, police officers shot and killed 16-year-old black teenager Kimani Gray in Brooklyn, New York. After observing suspicious behavior, the officers approached Gray, and he responded by drawing a firearm, pointing it squarely at the officers. (Not a good idea).
Despite the damning evidence that the officers were fully justified in shooting the suspect, riots ensued. Between 60 and 100 people took to the streets looting shops and smashing windows, allegedly chanting “NYPD, KKK, how many kids did you kill today”. Really all the hallmarks of a post-racial Obama America.
The next big moment for Obama’s post-racial era came in July of 2014. In a truly unfortunate incident, 43-year-old Eric Garner died after being placed under arrest by police officers. At a whopping 400 hundred pounds, Garner had a bevy of preexisting health conditions. After Garner resisted arrest, the officer – following standard protocol – administered a submission hold. This lead to Garner famously saying “I can’t breathe” – this line was like caviar to the fervid imaginations of liberal pundits. The autopsy showed however that Garner didn’t die of suffocation. The submission likely triggered Garner’s preexisting health conditions, killing him.
What should have led to a bipartisan effort to strike down useless laws prohibiting the sales of untaxed cigarettes, instead lead to violent race riots fueled by Obama’s mythical racist conspiracy against black Americans. He said, "And right now, unfortunately, we are seeing too many instances where people just do not have confidence that folks are being treated fairly. And in some cases, those may be misperceptions; but in some cases, that’s a reality.”
Next up is Ferguson, Missouri. August 2014. A name now synonymous with “black lives matter”. Eighteen-year-old black man Michael Brown robbed a convenience store. When pulled over by officer Darren Wilson, Brown tried to grab the officer’s gun. After it went off, Brown retreated until the officer exited his vehicle. At that point, Brown sprinted towards the officer, ignoring repeated pleas to stop. Officer Wilson shot Michael Brown, killing him. This was fully justified by all accounts, and Darren Wilson was fully acquitted by a grand jury. Nonetheless, this didn’t stop our divider-in-chief from coming out and exclaiming that the shooting “exposed the racial divide in the American justice system that stains the heart of black children.” Piling on, the national media took the contradicting reports of witnesses, with CNN hosts reporting that Brown had his hands up, exclaiming “don’t shoot”. This was a lie.
This led to protests lasting weeks, with looting and riots galore. A state of emergency was declared in Missouri. Had enough racial healing yet?
Obama’s reverse Midas-touch continued working its magic through 2015 when the national spotlight turned to Baltimore. After he was arrested for carrying an illegal switchblade, Freddie Gray died in the back of a police van as a result of spinal cord injuries. Despite the lack of evidence, liberals claimed Gray’s death to be a result of racism in policing. Adding fuel to the fire, racial-healing-monk Barack Obama stated, “This has been going on for a long time, this is not new, and we shouldn’t pretend that it’s new.”
Riots exploded across Baltimore, engulfing cars, businesses, and shops. A CVS Pharmacy was burned down, while the arsonists attacked firefighters trying to put the fire out.
Meanwhile, Baltimore’s Democrat mayor dumped a gallon of gasoline on the racial tensions, saying that she wanted to give space to those “who wished to destroy.”
In July of 2016, Philando Castile was driving with his girlfriend. Castile was pulled over by Jeronimo Yanez (A Chinese police officer). The vagaries of the traffic stop are unclear, but video shot after the altercation shows the officer shot and killed Castile.
Great-racial-healing-master Barack Obama was in Warsaw for a NATO summit at the time. Refusing to pass up an opportunity to chide America in a foreign nation, he addressed the shooting, “When incidents like this occur, there’s a big chunk of our citizenry that feels as if, because of the color of their skin, they are not being treated the same, and that hurts, and that should trouble all of us.”
Obama’s warm embrace of this fictional reality has demonstrably given leeway to radical race-baiters looking to riot and wreak havoc. Protests – albeit initially non-violent – quickly escalated into cinder blocks and fireworks tossed at police officers.
Despite Obama’s claims of unjust "systemic racism," the criminal justice system did its job. The officer responsible for the shooting was charged with second-degree manslaughter. The damage, however, was already done. Private property had been destroyed, businesses driven out, and tribal divisions intensified.
In Milwaukee August 2016, 23-year-old black male Sylville Smith was shot and killed by a black police officer. Exact details of the situation were still unclear at the time the event was reported. The suspect may have been threatening the officer with a firearm. Nonetheless, this was held up by the liberal Obama coalition as another example of system racism.
Racial agitators took to the streets, rioting for two nights. They set private property, businesses, and cars aflame. Police cars were destroyed and vandalized as the demonstrators tossed bricks through windshields.
In December of the same year, the officer who shot Smith was charged with homicide. It wasn’t because the riots and unrest had pressured the criminal justice system to abnegate their usual racist selves. The justice system works.
So, here we are. Eight years of racial healing under Barrack Obama’s leftist ideology and the country is far more divided than ever.
Racial riots and hostile tribal divisions weren’t nearly as common-occurring under past presidential administrations in recent history. What happened? Police activity or the criminal justice system didn’t suddenly begin to wantonly target black people as Obama was sworn into office.
At every opportunity to quash racial division, Obama's rhetoric instead amplified it. For eight years he continuously peddled the notion that America is a deeply racist, unjust vessel of oppression. While he would at times admit that some progress had been made in race relations, he consistently returned to his rhetoric about a country plagued by "systemic racism." And so, race relations in America changed to reflect the vision Obama promulgated for 8 years. The media beloved racial unifier, Barack Obama presided over the deterioration of race relations in America. If you like your race relations, you’ll get to keep your race relations.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/12230/complete-timeline-race-relations-under-obama-harry-khachatrian?utm_source=shapironewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=070516-news-title&utm_campaign=two
Sunday, January 8, 2017
Liberal Feminism What is Liberal Feminism? How Does It Differ From Other Feminisms?
In 1983, Alison Jaggar published Feminist Politics and Human Nature where she defined four theories related to feminism: liberal feminism, Marxism, radical feminism, and socialist feminism. Her analysis was not completely new; the varieties of feminism had begun to differentiate as early as the 1960s. Jaggar's contribution was clarifying, extending and solidifying the various definitions, which are still often used today.
Liberal feminism's primary goal is gender equality in the public sphere -- equal access to education, equal pay, ending job sex segregation, better working conditions -- won primarily through legal changes. Private sphere issues are of concern mainly as they influence or impede equality in the public sphere. Gaining access to and being paid and promoted equally in traditionally male-dominated occupations is an important goal. What do women want? Liberal feminism answers: mostly, what men want: to get an education, to make a decent living, to provide for one's family.
What she described as liberal feminism is theory and work that focuses more on issues like equality in the workplace, in education, in political rights. Where liberal feminism looks at issues in the private sphere, it tends to be in terms of equality: how does that private life impede or enhance public equality. Thus, liberal feminists also tend to support marriage as an equal partnership, and more male involvement in child care. Abortion and other reproductive rights have to do with control of one's life choices and autonomy. Ending domestic violence and sexual harassment have to do with removing obstacles to women achieving on an equal level with men.
Liberal feminism tends to rely on the state and political rights to gain equality -- to see the state as the protector of individual rights. Liberal feminism, for example, supports affirmative action legislation requiring employers and educational institutions to make special attempts to include women in the pool of applicants, on the assumption that past and current discrimination may simply overlook many qualified women applicants.
The Equal Rights Amendment was a key goal for many years of liberal feminists, from the original women's suffrage proponents who moved to advocating a federal equality amendment, to many of the feminists of the 1960s and 1970s in organizations including the National Organization for Women. The text of the Equal Rights Amendment, as passed by Congress and sent to the states in the 1970s, is classical liberal feminism:
"Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex."
While not denying that there may be biologically-based differences between men and women, liberal feminism cannot see that these are adequate justification for inequality, such as the wage gap between men and women.
Critics of liberal feminism point to a lack of critique of basic gender relationships, a focus on state action which links women's interests to those of the powerful, a lack of class or race analysis, and a lack of analysis of ways in which women are different from men. Critics often accuse liberal feminism of judging women and their success by male standards.
In more recent years, liberal feminism has sometimes been conflated with a kind of libertarian feminism, sometimes called equity feminism or individual feminism. Individual feminism often opposes legislative or state action, preferring to emphasize developing the skills and abilities of women to compete better in the world as it is. This feminism opposes laws that give either men or women advantages and privileges.
Bibliography:
A few key resources:
- Alison M. Jaggar. Feminist Politics and Human Nature.
- Drucilla Cornell. At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex, and Equality.
- Josephine Donovan. Feminist Theory: The Intellectual Traditions of American Feminism.
- Elizabeth Fox-Genovese. Feminism Without Illusions: A Critique of Individualism.
- Betty Friedan. The Feminine Mystique.
- Catharine MacKinnon. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State.
- John Stuart Mill. The Subjection of Women.
- Mary Wollstonecraft. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.
http://womenshistory.about.com/od/feminism/a/socialist-feminism-vs-other-feminisms.htm
Thursday, January 5, 2017
Tuesday, January 3, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)